First-line patient care management utilizes the nursing process for groups of
patients rather than an individual patient. The manager leads and coordinates
an often diverse team toward a common goal. Successful management is dependent
upon a governance structure, patient care delivery processes, and outcome measures
related to service. It requires professional practice to be consistent with
the organization’s mission and vision. A structure of shared governance
between management and staff creates an environment of accountability-based
systems, which needs to be evaluated to determine quality, care delivery, service,
and financial outcomes.
The author defines shared governance as an organizational frame
work with decentralized leadership among mutually interested vested parties,
including management and staff. Usually this type of structure develops council
models, which have evolved from former committees. These councils consist of
staff members that are charged with six different areas of accountability:
1. Clinical practice – establish practice standards for the work group
2. Quality council – credential staff and oversee unit quality management
initiatives
3. Education council – assess training needs and develop and implement
programs to meet staff needs
4. Research council – advances research and incorporates evidence finding
into clinical practice
5. Management council – ensure practice standards are adhered to on the
unit
6. Coordinating council – facilitates and integrates all of the above
activities
Professional practice requires that staff be competent to perform. Competency validation can be assured through a credentialing process that is built around a career ladder which acknowledges and quantifies varying skill sets based upon education and experience. Benner’s Novice to Expert model and the Colorado Differentiated Nursing Practice model are reviewed detailing the tasks, competencies, and outcomes required for practitioners based upon different levels of expertise.
Ongoing professional staff development is part of routine performance feedback that staff expects from his/her manager. The author explores situational leadership, which maintains that there are many leadership styles that need to be matched to staff’s or individual’s task-relevant readiness.
Accountability-based care
is reviewed using examples of primary care, patient-focused, and case management.
Finally, unit-based performance improvement plans are discussed demonstrating
the importance of the objectives of professional practice being met with positive
care delivery outcomes.